Compiled 25 August to 1 September, 2026, by Susan Manuel
Arrests climb nearby
CONNECTICUT. ICE arrested more than 90 immigrants in Danbury, Bridgeport, and Stamford, CT last week, targeting locations where day laborers meet in the early mornings seeking work, including parks, supermarkets, Home Depot, and near an elementary school. People were beaten and tasered with one man hospitalized. ‘They’re ….trying to shoot fish in a barrel. They’re rounding them up without showing any kind of warrants,” said Seth Garben with Danbury Unites for Immigrants. Danbury is one of the state’s most diverse towns with 35% of the population born outside the U.S. including large communities from Brazil and Ecuador. It has been a “hotspot for immigration enforcement for about a year,” reported Connecticut Public Radio.
The raids began on the first day of school, adding fear to the communities. The schools’ superintendent declared the schools safe spaces and instructed bus drivers who encounter law enforcement activity to keep students on the bus and return them to school. Those arrested included a Danbury resident of 30 years with work authorization, a tax ID, and application for permanent residency. State and local officials expressed outrage. “When we hear folks say ‘oh we want people to do it the right way,’ the folks doing it the right way are also getting deported,” said Danbury Mayor Roberto Alves.
Eyewitnesses said agents grabbed adults who had just dropped children at a school bus, a claim ICE called “FALSE.” Gov. Ned Lamont, Sen. Chris Murphy, and Rep. Jahana Hayes joined Alves and other officials in Danbury to assure immigrant community members of their support. Connecticut Attorney General William Tong called the actions “indiscriminate terror sweeps” and said he may file a civil lawsuit against the federal government.
Lamont said that at a governors’ meeting early this year, “President Trump told us he would not be sending ICE into cities that did not ask for the help. Let me be clear: Connecticut does not want, nor do we need, the type of presence ICE has had in our state this week. Connecticut has some of the lowest crime rates in the country, thanks to the excellent work of our state and local police to keep violent criminals off our streets. Rounding up people at random to fill a quota does not lower crime. It traumatizes families and communities.” In response to a request from Connecticut Insider, DHS sent a list of five “public safety threats” it said ICE had arrested in the state, i.e., men with previous criminal convictions. However DHS had sent the same list to the publication twice before, in February and in July.
NY & NJ. The New York Times reported on 27 August, “ICE Arrests Soar as People with no Criminal Record are Increasingly Targeted.” Among those arrested this summer have been people married to U.S. citizens, asylum applicants who entered the U.S. legally, and others with temporary protected status. The share of those arrested with a past violent criminal conviction was less than four percent. ICE is nearing its goal of 2,000 arrests per day, with the biggest surge taking place in Florida and Texas. The new records are due to an increase in agents—to 29,000 in June. And ICE is relying more upon state and local law enforcement partners. The 287(g) program is operating in 39 states currently, particularly in states where ICE presence is limited.
NPR reported that ICE recorded 49,571 arrests in July. Deportations are now averaging over 1,000 per day. ICE arrests in New York and New Jersey spiked in July: New Jersey saw a 148 % increase from May to July. New York arrests increased by 80 % with 1,355 taken in July. Mark Kirkorian of the Center for Immigration Studies said that the government “changed the tactics and are, if anything, being more effective.”
The Times wrote last week that “the new ICE activity, more discreet and dexterous than the highly visible raids in large cities last year, has surprised towns, suburbs and cities across the U.S. …. Plainclothes agents in masks have resurfaced in towns and neighborhoods with large Hispanic populations, arresting immigrants at bus stops, construction sites and gas stations…. The overall surge in arrests has appeared to operate largely out of public view, insulated by more targeted operations and limited media attention.” In addition, ICE is “poised to expand detention significantly in the next year,” The Times wrote, noting new detention facilities slated to open in the fall and the possibility of reviving its plan to convert warehouses into detention centers.
- Syracuse.com reports that more than 500 people have been arrested in Onondaga County—mainly in Syracuse and most from Ecuador; 82 percent with no criminal history. “The encounters happen so quickly and so quietly that it is rare for journalists or advocates to arrive in time to witness an arrest. Most happen in the morning….”
- City Reporter said many people apprehended at NYC ICE offices were released the same day on “orders of recognizance” requiring them to check in with ICE regularly.
- The Hill cited DHS’ response to a previous NYT story on harsh conditions in detention centers: “Another day and another hoax about ICE detention from the @nytimes. The media is clearly desperate for these false allegations to be true.”
Immigration Impacts NY State Politics
In a piece on the proposed Newburgh detention center The New York Times noted the warehouse and Gov. Kathy Hochul’s “Local Cops, Local Crimes Act” banning cooperation between local law enforcement and ICE, are now factors in the gubernatorial race.
“The spectre of a detention center has inflamed the community, leading to protests, legislative resolutions and now an effort to force Gov. Kathy Hochul to intervene,” the Times reported. “Yet it remains unclear how far Ms. Hochul, a moderate, is willing to go to block ICE operations in New York.” Last month a coalition of 63 New York congressional representatives and lawmakers urged the governor to issue an executive order to proactively block the project and others like it. They outlined a new strategy to stop the conversion of the Newburgh warehouse by keeping ICE from connecting to local water and sewer services. The group included Rep. Pat Ryan, State Senator Julia Salazar, and Assemblywoman Sarahana Shrestha. The Kingston Daily Freeman put the proposal to ban the use of local resources for detention facilities on its front page as it seems the month-old letter was released the day after Hochul’s ban on 287(g) agreements was to come into effect.
Shrestha noted that ICE often relies upon state and local resources to expand and improve local infrastructure for its benefit. She called on Hochul to sign an executive order immediately, before the legislature returns in January. Hochul’s spokeswoman declined to address the possibility of executive action on the Newburgh site but said the administration would continue to work with communities to ensure such facilities would not be built without community input as required by the new state law. ICE has not responded to Hochul’s letter to DHS last month asking for information on detention center plans for New York.
287(g) AGREEMENTS ARE OUT. OR, ARE THEY? Media also reported that as the new state ban on 287(g) agreements was about to go into effect, two counties–Nassau and Rensselaer–had publicly refused to end their cooperation with ICE. However, at the last minute, Nassau County succumbed. Its county executive, Bruce Blakeman, Republican candidate for governor, announced on 25 August that his sheriff will abide by the new law, although the county will join the federal lawsuit filed by the Trump administration challenging the law, which Blakeman said was “’written with the blood of the victims of illegal migrants past, present and future,…makes us less safe, and was done for political purposes.’”
Spectrum News commentators discussed Blakeman’s attempt to appease voters concerned with immigration abuses while adhering to Trump’s anti-immigration platform. NY Attorney General Letitia James said she was suing the Rensselaer County sheriff “to ensure that local law enforcement agencies uphold their duty to keep New Yorkers safe.” Still the future of the new law is uncertain: media have reported that the Federation for American Immigration Reform has filed a suit on behalf of 15 county sheriffs challenging the law. The sheriffs also filed an emergency motion seeking a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to stop the state from voiding the 287(g) agreements. The sheriffs argue that they have the authority to decide on their county’s cooperation with federal agents as they are independently elected. Greene County Sheriff Peter Kusminsky told WAMC that his county doesn’t have a 287(g) agreement, but that he joined the suit due to “overreach of the governor.”
Hochul and James responded with a joint statement saying most sheriffs have been “successfully protecting their communities without any collaboration with ICE” and that if agencies don’t comply with the new law they will file a civil suit. “The legal fight is now moving forward in federal court. A federal judge issued an order to show cause in the case tied to the request for the temporary restraining order, and the state has until Sept. 9 to respond.” (WRGB Albany)
Mobile detention centers and one-stop deportations
Project Saltbox reported on a DHS contract solicitation which “lays out in more detail than any document made public, how ICE intends to arrest, hold, try and deport people at scale in the wake of its failed warehouse conversion project.” The document describes a streamlined operation run mostly by private contractors that “carries a person from the moment of arrest to the flight out of the country. Contractors would hold people in vans at the scene of arrests, then drive them to buildings owned by private companies but called “federal facilities.” There they would staff immigration courtrooms, prepare removal paperwork and flight manifests, and “effectuate departures.” They are seeking 5,500 detention beds in Pennsylvania, Colorado, Washington and Florida.
“Arrest teams” would store detainees in vans at the scene of arrest until full or at the end of an operation. ICE is seeking 12 additional transport teams a day at seven locations. The proposal has only one provision for how long a person can be held in a vehicle: “Except in emergency situations, females may not be transported by bus for more than 10 hours.’”
MORE CRUELTY FOR KIDS. CBS News reported that an immigration court judge in Chicago ordered six children, ages 12 to 17, to be deported after they were deemed abandoned by state courts. “Judge Shawn Abraham was not in court for Wednesday’s hearings. He appeared virtually while requiring kids to be there in person.” Each child had a pending Special Immigrant Juvenile Status (SILJS) application. This is new: until June, a pending SIJS application meant termination of removal proceedings said attorney Laura Smith of the Children’s Legal Center.
HORROR STORIES OF DETAINEES SHIPPED TO AFRICA. The NY Times reported horror stories from 10 immigrants interviewed as they were deported to Equatorial Guinea and Liberia, which will take 1,200 detainees from the US. This is hard reading, as it describes physical and psychological torture.

Madhuri Shukla, Detention Watch Network, via JustSeeds.org
Tamasflex, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons